Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 83 versus 80. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 75.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 98% to 85.3%. Claude Opus 4.6 does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Opus 4.6 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Claude Opus 4.6 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.6 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Claude Opus 4.6
75.5
Exaone 4.0 32B
81.8
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Claude Opus 4.6
97.3
Exaone 4.0 32B
85.3
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 80. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 98% and 85.3%.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 75.5. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.3 versus 85.3. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.