Claude Opus 4.6 vs K-Exaone

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Claude Opus 4.6 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 80 to 49. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 49.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 80.8% to 49.4%.

K-Exaone is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Opus 4.6 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Claude Opus 4.6 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for K-Exaone.

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. K-Exaone only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

65.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Coming soon
84%
BrowseComp
Coming soon
72.7%
OSWorld-Verified
Coming soon

Coding

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

72

K-Exaone

49.4

91%
HumanEval
Coming soon
80.8%
SWE-bench Verified
49.4%
76%
LiveCodeBench
Coming soon
39.6%
FLTEval
Coming soon
65.3%
SWE-Rebench
Coming soon

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

77.3%
MMMU-Pro
Coming soon

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

93%
MuSR
Coming soon
76%
MRCRv2
Coming soon
68.8%
ARC-AGI-2
Coming soon

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

99%
MMLU
Coming soon
91.3%
GPQA
Coming soon
95%
SuperGPQA
Coming soon
82%
MMLU-Pro
Coming soon
53%
HLE
Coming soon
72%
SimpleQA
Coming soon

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

95%
IFEval
Coming soon

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

96%
MGSM
Coming soon

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

99%
AIME 2023
Coming soon
99%
AIME 2024
Coming soon
98%
AIME 2025
Coming soon
95%
HMMT Feb 2023
Coming soon
97%
HMMT Feb 2024
Coming soon
96%
HMMT Feb 2025
Coming soon
96%
BRUMO 2025
Coming soon
98%
MATH-500
Coming soon

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or K-Exaone?

Claude Opus 4.6 is ahead overall, 80 to 49. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 80.8% and 49.4%.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or K-Exaone?

Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 49.4. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.