Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.7

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Claude Opus 4.6 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 76 to 57. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 77.3 against 56.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 65.4% to 57%.

Claude Opus 4.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.7. That is roughly 62.5x on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.6 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for MiniMax M2.7.

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

72.6

MiniMax M2.7

57

65.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
57%
84%
BrowseComp
Coming soon
72.7%
OSWorld-Verified
Coming soon
Coming soon
Toolathlon
46.3%
Coming soon
MLE-Bench Lite
66.6%
Coming soon
MM-ClawBench
62.7%

Coding

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

77.3

MiniMax M2.7

56.2

91%
HumanEval
Coming soon
80.8%
SWE-bench Verified
Coming soon
76%
LiveCodeBench
Coming soon
39.6%
FLTEval
Coming soon
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
56.2%
Coming soon
SWE Multilingual
76.5%
Coming soon
Multi-SWE Bench
52.7%
Coming soon
VIBE-Pro
55.6%
Coming soon
NL2Repo
39.8%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

77.3%
MMMU-Pro
Coming soon
Coming soon
GDPval-AA
1495

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

93%
MuSR
Coming soon
76%
MRCRv2
Coming soon
68.8%
ARC-AGI-2
Coming soon

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

99%
MMLU
Coming soon
91.3%
GPQA
Coming soon
95%
SuperGPQA
Coming soon
82%
MMLU-Pro
Coming soon
53%
HLE
Coming soon
72%
SimpleQA
Coming soon
Coming soon
Artificial Analysis
50

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

95%
IFEval
Coming soon

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

96%
MGSM
Coming soon

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

99%
AIME 2023
Coming soon
99%
AIME 2024
Coming soon
98%
AIME 2025
Coming soon
95%
HMMT Feb 2023
Coming soon
97%
HMMT Feb 2024
Coming soon
96%
HMMT Feb 2025
Coming soon
96%
BRUMO 2025
Coming soon
98%
MATH-500
Coming soon

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiniMax M2.7?

Claude Opus 4.6 is ahead overall, 76 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 65.4% and 57%.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiniMax M2.7?

Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.3 versus 56.2. MiniMax M2.7 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiniMax M2.7?

Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.6 versus 57. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.