Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Gemma 4 31B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

90

VS

Gemma 4 31B

66

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · Gemma 4 31B unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
72.9vs41.6

+31.3 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
68.2vs61.3

+6.9 difference

Multimodal

Gemma 4 31B
64.3vs76.9

+12.6 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Gemma 4 31B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72.9 against 41.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 54.7% to 26.5%. Gemma 4 31B does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 31B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 54.7% and 26.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 61.3. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 41.6. Gemma 4 31B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Gemma 4 31B?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.9 versus 64.3. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.