Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

71.63/100
Margin
33.1pts
← winning
38.56/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: Claude Opus 4.7 supported; Grok Code Fast 1 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.7; 1 to Grok Code Fast 1.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
12
Claude Opus 4.7 only
10
Grok Code Fast 1 only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Opus 4.7 is priced at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok Code Fast 1. Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7ΔGrok Code Fast 1
CodingClaude Opus 4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 170.8
MathClaude Opus 4.738.6MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.7$5 input / $25 outputGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputGrok Code Fast 1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.7Not availableGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.7Not availableGrok Code Fast 12.81 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.71MGrok Code Fast 1256KClaude Opus 4.7 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 74%75.7%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Gert LabsSource 65.59%—Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 20.7%—Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 13.9%—Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 71.00%—Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 82.8%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 54.5%17.4%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 50.1%36.2%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
FrontierCodeSource 38.5%—Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —70.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-LCRSource 67.0%48.3%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
CritPtSource 5.1%0.0%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.7%21.6%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.5%72.7%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
AA-HLESource 31.2%7.5%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 14.2%-36.0%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.5%23.8%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.9%78.5%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Math
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 43.793%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 22.917%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 76.4%—Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1328—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 43.6%41.4%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1 today?

Claude Opus 4.7: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Anthropic Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.