Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GPT-5.2 Instant is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 85 to 76. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.2 Instant's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 75.5 against 57.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 43 to 21.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.50 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.2 Instant. That is roughly 2.5x on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 Instant is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Claude Sonnet 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for GPT-5.2 Instant.
Pick GPT-5.2 Instant if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Sonnet 4.5 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 200K context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
GPT-5.2 Instant
79.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5
70.3
GPT-5.2 Instant
75.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
57.5
GPT-5.2 Instant
93.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
91.4
GPT-5.2 Instant
90.9
Claude Sonnet 4.5
86
GPT-5.2 Instant
79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5
70.7
GPT-5.2 Instant
95
Claude Sonnet 4.5
90
GPT-5.2 Instant
94.4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
88.4
GPT-5.2 Instant
97.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5
92.4
GPT-5.2 Instant is ahead overall, 85 to 76. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 43 and 21.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.8 versus 70.7. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 57.5. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.2 versus 92.4. Inside this category, MATH-500 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 90.9 versus 86. Inside this category, BBH is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 70.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 93.1 versus 91.4. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 95 versus 90. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Instant has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 94.4 versus 88.4. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.