Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.7

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 finishes one point ahead overall, 58 to 57. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Claude Sonnet 4.5's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 77.2 against 56.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 50% to 57%. MiniMax M2.7 does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.7. That is roughly 12.5x on output cost alone.

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

MiniMax M2.7

Claude Sonnet 4.5

55.3

MiniMax M2.7

57

50%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
57%
61.4%
OSWorld-Verified
Coming soon
Coming soon
Toolathlon
46.3%
Coming soon
MLE-Bench Lite
66.6%
Coming soon
MM-ClawBench
62.7%

Coding

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

77.2

MiniMax M2.7

56.2

77.2%
SWE-bench Verified
Coming soon
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
56.2%
Coming soon
SWE Multilingual
76.5%
Coming soon
Multi-SWE Bench
52.7%
Coming soon
VIBE-Pro
55.6%
Coming soon
NL2Repo
39.8%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
GDPval-AA
1495

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

13.6%
ARC-AGI-2
Coming soon

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

91%
SimpleQA
Coming soon
Coming soon
Artificial Analysis
50

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Multilingual

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Mathematics

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M2.7?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is ahead overall, 58 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 50% and 57%.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M2.7?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 56.2. MiniMax M2.7 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57 versus 55.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.