Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 76 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Sonnet 4.5's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 57.5 against 33. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 87 to 58.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ministral 3 14B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Sonnet 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B.
Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 14B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Claude Sonnet 4.5
70.3
Ministral 3 14B
48.4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
57.5
Ministral 3 14B
33
Claude Sonnet 4.5
91.4
Ministral 3 14B
70.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
86
Ministral 3 14B
63.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5
70.7
Ministral 3 14B
50.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
90
Ministral 3 14B
80
Claude Sonnet 4.5
88.4
Ministral 3 14B
76.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5
92.4
Ministral 3 14B
69.7
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is ahead overall, 76 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 87 and 58.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.7 versus 50.1. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 57.5 versus 33. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 69.7. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 86 versus 63.6. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.3 versus 48.4. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 91.4 versus 70.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 90 versus 80. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.4 versus 76.8. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.