Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM-5

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

85

VS

GLM-5

77

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.6 unranked · GLM-5 #12

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Sonnet 4.6
65.3vs56.2

+9.1 difference

Coding

Claude Sonnet 4.6
66.4vs63.2

+3.2 difference

Knowledge

Claude Sonnet 4.6
73.7vs70.7

+3.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6

GLM-5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$3 / $15

$0 / $0

Speed

44 t/s

74 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.48s

1.64s

Context Window

200K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 85 to 77. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Sonnet 4.6's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.3 against 56.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SuperGPQA, 95% to 66.8%.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 85 to 77. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SuperGPQA, where the scores are 95% and 66.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.7 versus 70.7. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 66.4 versus 63.2. Inside this category, SWE-Rebench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.3 versus 56.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.