Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o3-mini

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 86 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Sonnet 4.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 49.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 97 to 77.2. o3-mini does hit back in instruction following, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens for o3-mini. That is roughly 3.4x on output cost alone. o3-mini is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Knowledge

o3-mini

Claude Sonnet 4.6

81.3

o3-mini

82.1

99
MMLU
86.9
97
GPQA
77.2
95
SuperGPQA
-
93
OpenBookQA
-
83
MMLU-Pro
-
21
HLE
-

Coding

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

72

o3-mini

49.3

93
HumanEval
-
69
SWE-bench Verified
49.3
54
LiveCodeBench
-

Mathematics

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

96.4

o3-mini

87.3

99
AIME 2023
-
99
AIME 2024
87.3
98
AIME 2025
-
95
HMMT Feb 2023
-
97
HMMT Feb 2024
-
96
HMMT Feb 2025
-
96
BRUMO 2025
-
91
MATH-500
-

Reasoning

Claude Sonnet 4.6
95
SimpleQA
-
93
MuSR
-
88
BBH
-

Instruction Following

o3-mini

Claude Sonnet 4.6

91

o3-mini

93.9

91
IFEval
93.9

Multilingual

Claude Sonnet 4.6
91
MGSM
-

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ahead overall, 86 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 97 and 77.2.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

o3-mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 81.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 49.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 96.4 versus 87.3. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

o3-mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.9 versus 91. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 9, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.