Composer 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.1 Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 76.1 against 61.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is React Native Evals, 97.2% to 79.1%.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.50 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Composer 2. That is roughly 2.0x on output cost alone. Composer 2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Composer 2.

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Composer 2 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Composer 2

61.7

Gemini 3.1 Pro

76.1

61.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
77%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
86%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
68%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

73.7%
SWE Multilingual
Coming soon
97.2%
React Native Evals
79.1%
Coming soon
HumanEval
91%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
75%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
71%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
72%
Coming soon
SWE-Rebench
62.3%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
95%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
95%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
93%
Coming soon
BBH
92%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
93%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
90%
Coming soon
ARC-AGI-2
77.1%

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMLU
99%
Coming soon
GPQA
97%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
95%
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
92%
Coming soon
HLE
40%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
88%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
95%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
95%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
96%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
93%

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
AIME 2023
99%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
99%
Coming soon
AIME 2025
98%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
95%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
97%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
96%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
96%
Coming soon
MATH-500
97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Composer 2 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead overall, 83 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is React Native Evals, where the scores are 97.2% and 79.1%.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Composer 2 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.1 versus 61.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.