Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Grok 4 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 67 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Composer 2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Grok 4 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Composer 2 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Grok 4.
Pick Grok 4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Composer 2 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.
Composer 2
61.7
Grok 4
58.1
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Grok 4 is ahead overall, 67 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is React Native Evals, where the scores are 97.2% and 72.1%.
Composer 2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.7 versus 58.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.