Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Composer 2 has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 62 versus 60. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Composer 2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 61.7 against 56.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 61.7% to 56%.
Composer 2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.50 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Super 100B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Composer 2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Nemotron 3 Super 100B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Composer 2.
Pick Composer 2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Super 100B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.
Composer 2
61.7
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
56.6
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Composer 2 is ahead overall, 62 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 61.7% and 56%.
Composer 2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.7 versus 56.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.