Model comparison
DBRX Instruct vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DBRX Instruct unranked (Not scored); Gemini 3.1 Pro #83 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DBRX Instruct and Gemini 3.1 Pro share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DBRX Instruct; 47 to Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DBRX Instruct only
- 0
- Gemini 3.1 Pro only
- 47
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DBRX Instruct and Gemini 3.1 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for DBRX Instruct yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is priced at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DBRX Instruct. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for DBRX Instruct.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DBRX Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DBRX Instruct$0 input / $0 output | Gemini 3.1 Pro$2 input / $12 output | DBRX Instruct has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DBRX InstructNot available | Gemini 3.1 Pro109 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DBRX InstructNot available | Gemini 3.1 Pro29.71 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DBRX Instruct32K | Gemini 3.1 Pro1M | Gemini 3.1 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic16 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DBRX Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 69.7% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 95.6% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 21.4% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 32.0% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 23.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 965 | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 56.87% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 13.3% | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | — | 37.5% | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 42.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 58.9% | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 30.3% | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 16.5% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 53.8% | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | — | 73.8% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DBRX Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-DSource | — | 94.3% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 45.4% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | — | 20.6% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | — | 71.5% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 46.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 94.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 44.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 32.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 55.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 49.9% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DBRX Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource | — | 93.2% | Not comparable |
Multimodal9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DBRX Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 83.9% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 80.2% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 69.4% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 72.4% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 84.4% | Not comparable |
| ZeroBenchSource | — | 29.0% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 81.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 82.4% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1281 | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DBRX Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DBRX Instruct and Gemini 3.1 Pro on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DBRX Instruct and Gemini 3.1 Pro today?
DBRX Instruct: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.