Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
DeepSeek V3.1 has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 35 versus 33. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
o1-pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V3.1 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. o1-pro gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1.
Pick DeepSeek V3.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.
DeepSeek V3.1
29.7
o1-pro
79
DeepSeek V3.1
35.4
o1-pro
86
DeepSeek V3.1 is ahead overall, 35 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2024, where the scores are 35 and 86.
o1-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79 versus 29.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o1-pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 86 versus 35.4. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.