Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 70 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 51.2 against 8.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 79 to 17.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking.
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
69.4
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
34.1
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
51.2
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
8.2
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
71
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
32.4
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
80.6
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
38.4
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
64.4
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
27
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
85
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
72
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
80.8
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
60.7
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
85.1
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
42.3
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is ahead overall, 70 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 79 and 17.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 64.4 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 51.2 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.1 versus 42.3. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 38.4. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.4 versus 34.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 71 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 72. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.8 versus 60.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.