DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 70 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 51.2 against 35. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 58 to 36. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Quick Verdict

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Agentic

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

69.4

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

58.5

71
Terminal-Bench 2.0
60
70
BrowseComp
61
67
OSWorld-Verified
55

Coding

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

51.2

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

35

79
HumanEval
62
48
SWE-bench Verified
39
45
LiveCodeBench
33
58
SWE-bench Pro
36

Multimodal & Grounded

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

71

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

71.5

66
MMMU-Pro
71
77
OfficeQA Pro
72

Reasoning

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

80.6

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

69.2

83
SimpleQA
70
81
MuSR
70
86
BBH
80
78
LongBench v2
66
78
MRCRv2
66

Knowledge

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

64.4

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

52.1

87
MMLU
71
85
GPQA
70
83
SuperGPQA
68
81
OpenBookQA
66
73
MMLU-Pro
69
22
HLE
7
77
FrontierScience
62

Instruction Following

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

85

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

81

85
IFEval
81

Multilingual

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

80.8

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

77.8

84
MGSM
81
79
MMLU-ProX
76

Mathematics

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

85.1

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

75.2

87
AIME 2023
73
89
AIME 2024
75
88
AIME 2025
74
83
HMMT Feb 2023
69
85
HMMT Feb 2024
71
84
HMMT Feb 2025
70
86
BRUMO 2025
72
84
MATH-500
79

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is ahead overall, 70 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 58 and 36.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 64.4 versus 52.1. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 51.2 versus 35. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.1 versus 75.2. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 69.2. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.4 versus 58.5. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.5 versus 71. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 81. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.8 versus 77.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.