DeepSeek V3.2 vs Exaone 4.0 32B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 58.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85% to 85.3%.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V3.2 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3.2 only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

60%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Coming soon
62%
BrowseComp
Coming soon
55%
OSWorld-Verified
Coming soon

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

76%
HumanEval
Coming soon
45%
SWE-bench Verified
Coming soon
39%
LiveCodeBench
Coming soon
60.9%
SWE-Rebench
Coming soon

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

72%
OfficeQA Pro
Coming soon

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

79%
MuSR
Coming soon
81%
BBH
Coming soon
69%
LongBench v2
Coming soon
70%
MRCRv2
Coming soon
4%
ARC-AGI-2
Coming soon

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

DeepSeek V3.2

58.6

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

84%
MMLU
Coming soon
83%
GPQA
Coming soon
81%
SuperGPQA
Coming soon
11%
HLE
Coming soon
72%
FrontierScience
Coming soon
81%
SimpleQA
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
81.8%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

85%
IFEval
Coming soon

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

84%
MGSM
Coming soon
81%
MMLU-ProX
Coming soon

Mathematics

Exaone 4.0 32B

DeepSeek V3.2

83.3

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

84%
AIME 2023
Coming soon
86%
AIME 2024
Coming soon
85%
AIME 2025
85.3%
80%
HMMT Feb 2023
Coming soon
82%
HMMT Feb 2024
Coming soon
81%
HMMT Feb 2025
Coming soon
83%
BRUMO 2025
Coming soon
81%
MATH-500
Coming soon

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 or Exaone 4.0 32B?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85% and 85.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 or Exaone 4.0 32B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 58.6. DeepSeek V3.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V3.2 or Exaone 4.0 32B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 83.3. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.