DeepSeek V3.2 vs Seed 1.6 Flash

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

DeepSeek V3.2 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 64 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

DeepSeek V3.2's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 43.2 against 27.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 45 to 24. Seed 1.6 Flash does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Seed 1.6 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V3.2 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed 1.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.2.

Quick Verdict

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Seed 1.6 Flash only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Agentic

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2

58.8

Seed 1.6 Flash

54.5

60
Terminal-Bench 2.0
52
62
BrowseComp
62
55
OSWorld-Verified
52

Coding

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2

43.2

Seed 1.6 Flash

27.6

76
HumanEval
59
45
SWE-bench Verified
24
39
LiveCodeBench
25
47
SWE-bench Pro
31

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6 Flash

DeepSeek V3.2

66

Seed 1.6 Flash

73.1

61
MMMU-Pro
74
72
OfficeQA Pro
72

Reasoning

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2

75.3

Seed 1.6 Flash

66.8

81
SimpleQA
61
79
MuSR
59
81
BBH
75
69
LongBench v2
70
70
MRCRv2
74

Knowledge

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2

60

Seed 1.6 Flash

47.3

84
MMLU
65
83
GPQA
64
81
SuperGPQA
62
79
OpenBookQA
60
73
MMLU-Pro
65
11
HLE
3
72
FrontierScience
57

Instruction Following

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2

85

Seed 1.6 Flash

81

85
IFEval
81

Multilingual

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2

82.1

Seed 1.6 Flash

72.8

84
MGSM
76
81
MMLU-ProX
71

Mathematics

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2

82.1

Seed 1.6 Flash

67.1

84
AIME 2023
64
86
AIME 2024
66
85
AIME 2025
65
80
HMMT Feb 2023
60
82
HMMT Feb 2024
62
81
HMMT Feb 2025
61
83
BRUMO 2025
63
81
MATH-500
72

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 is ahead overall, 64 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 45 and 24.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60 versus 47.3. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 43.2 versus 27.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 67.1. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 75.3 versus 66.8. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 58.8 versus 54.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 66. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 81. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 72.8. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.