Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3 vs K-Exaone

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

DeepSeek
44.97/100
Margin
3.5pts
winning →
LG AI Research
48.45/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3 #147 (Supported); K-Exaone #126 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3 and K-Exaone share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to DeepSeek V3; 0 to K-Exaone.

Updated July 18, 2026
Shared results
11
DeepSeek V3 only
11
K-Exaone only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3 and K-Exaone is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

K-Exaone has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3 and K-Exaone
CategoryDeepSeek V3ΔK-Exaone
CodingDeepSeek V338.9MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured
KnowledgeDeepSeek V372.7MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured
MathDeepSeek V31.7MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V386.1MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3$0.27 input / $1.1 outputK-ExaoneNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3Not availableK-ExaoneNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3Not availableK-ExaoneNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3128KK-Exaone256KK-Exaone lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 22.8%74.3%K-Exaone leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 217Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneResult
LiveCodeBenchSource 37.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 42%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 23.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 35.4%35.6%K-Exaone leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneResult
AA-LCRSource 29.0%55.7%K-Exaone leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.1%K-Exaone leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneResult
GPQASource 59.1%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.2%24.7%K-Exaone leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 55.7%78.3%K-Exaone leads
AA-HLESource 3.6%13.1%K-Exaone leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.3%-57.9%DeepSeek V3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.4%16.5%DeepSeek V3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.4%89.1%K-Exaone leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.724%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3K-ExaoneResult
IFEvalSource 86.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 34.8%64.7%K-Exaone leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3 and K-Exaone on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3 and K-Exaone today?

DeepSeek V3: $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V3
API / mo$1,028
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even1.2B/day
K-Exaone
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 18, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.