Skip to main content

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)

77

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

75

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) #12 · Qwen3.6-27B #13

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
63.3vs59.3

+4.0 difference

Coding

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
73.7vs70.6

+3.1 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6-27B
60vs62.2

+2.2 difference

Operational Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.14 / $0.28

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 77 versus 75. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)'s sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 63.3 against 59.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 34.8% to 24%. Qwen3.6-27B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.6-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or Qwen3.6-27B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 75. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 34.8% and 24%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.2 versus 60. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or Qwen3.6-27B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.7 versus 70.6. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or Qwen3.6-27B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 63.3 versus 59.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
API / mo$315
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.