Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
43
Gemma 4 E2B
27
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro Base if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E2B only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Knowledge
+9.3 difference
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
Gemma 4 E2B
$null / $null
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
128K
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro Base if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E2B only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 43 to 27. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 63.4 against 54.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 73.5% to 60%.
Gemma 4 E2B is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E2B.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 43 to 27. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 73.5% and 60%.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 63.4 versus 54.1. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.