Skip to main content

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs Qwen3.5-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base

43

VS

Qwen3.5-27B

64

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro Base unranked · Qwen3.5-27B #15

Pick Qwen3.5-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only becomes the better choice if multilingual is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Reasoning

Qwen3.5-27B
51.5vs60.6

+9.1 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-27B
63.4vs80.6

+17.2 difference

Multilingual

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
84.4vs82.2

+2.2 difference

Operational Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base

Qwen3.5-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.5-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only becomes the better choice if multilingual is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Qwen3.5-27B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 64 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.5-27B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 80.6 against 63.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 73.5% to 86.1%. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base does hit back in multilingual, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.5-27B is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 64 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 73.5% and 86.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 63.4. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 51.5. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Qwen3.5-27B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.4 versus 82.2. Qwen3.5-27B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.