Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 27 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
70.19/100
3 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2.5-Pro #14 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share 27 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max); 4 to MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
27
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) only
21
MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
4
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) makes more sense if coding is the priority; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the better fit if its strengths line up with your actual workload.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 27 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)ΔMiMo-V2.5-Pro
CodingDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)70.9Margin← 13.7MiMo-V2.5-Pro57.2
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)60.1Margin← 12.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro48.0
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)74.5Margin← 6.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro68.4
MathDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)95.2MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.5-ProNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)B · MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  1. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 37.7%B 48%
    Winner: MiMo-V2.5-ProΔ 10.3
    HLE: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 37.7%; MiMo-V2.5-Pro scored 48%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins this benchmark.

  2. SWE-bench Pro

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 55.4%B 57.2%
    Winner: MiMo-V2.5-ProΔ 1.8
    SWE-bench Pro: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 55.4%; MiMo-V2.5-Pro scored 57.2%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins this benchmark.

  3. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 67.9%B 68.4%
    Winner: MiMo-V2.5-ProΔ 0.5
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 67.9%; MiMo-V2.5-Pro scored 68.4%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)$0.435 input / $0.87 outputMiMo-V2.5-ProNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Not availableMiMo-V2.5-ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Not availableMiMo-V2.5-ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)1MMiMo-V2.5-Pro1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 67.9%68.4%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
BrowseCompSource 83.4%—Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 48.2%—Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 73.6%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 13071265DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
ToolathlonSource 51.8%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 36.4%29.1%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 24.3%2.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 96.2%94.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
GDPval-AASource 40.4%38.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA BriefcaseSource 932873DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 40.4%—Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 84.4%73.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA ITBenchSource 38.3%38.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA Tau3 BankingSource 25.8%—Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 46.2%43.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
aaTerminalBench21Source 64%65.2%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claw-EvalSource —63.8%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource —72.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —62.70%Not comparable
CodingDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
CodeforcesSource 3206.0—Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80.6%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 55.4%57.2%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
SWE MultilingualSource 76.2%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 67.9%68.4%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 49.93%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 59.4%60.2%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
AA-SciCodeSource 50.0%50.2%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
MRCR 1MSource 83.5%—Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 62.0%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 66.3%73.3%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
CritPtSource 12.9%4.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
MMLU-ProSource 87.5%—Not comparable
SimpleQASource 57.9%—Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 84.4%—Not comparable
GPQASource 90.1%—Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 90.1%—Not comparable
HLESource 37.7%48%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 44.3%42.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.8%86.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA-HLESource 35.9%33.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.0%3.6%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.3%22.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.0%24.5%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
AA Openness IndexSource 50.0%38.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
HLE w/o toolsSource —34%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 95.2%—Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 89.8%—Not comparable
ApexSource 38.3%—Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 90.2%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12641298MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 76.5%79.9%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.1 versus 48. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.9 versus 57.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 68.4. Inside this category, AA Briefcase is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

DeepSeek Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.