Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
87
o1
58
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) #2 · o1 unranked
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Knowledge
+9.6 difference
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
o1
$1.74 / $3.48
$15 / $60
N/A
98 t/s
N/A
32.29s
1M
200K
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $15.00 input / $60.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.74 input / $3.48 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max). That is roughly 17.2x on output cost alone. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 90.1% and 75.7%.
o1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.7 versus 66.1. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.