Skip to main content

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

DeepSeek V4 Pro

71

VS

MiMo-V2.5

74

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro #22 · MiMo-V2.5 unranked

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5
59.1vs65.8

+6.7 difference

Coding

DeepSeek V4 Pro
58.8vs56.1

+2.7 difference

Operational Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro

MiMo-V2.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.74 / $3.48

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

MiMo-V2.5 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 74 versus 71. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

MiMo-V2.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.8 against 59.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 59.1% to 65.8%. DeepSeek V4 Pro does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5 is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V4 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 74 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 59.1% and 65.8%.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 58.8 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 59.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.