Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 51. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 77.
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeekMath V2 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
DeepSeekMath V2
77
Exaone 4.0 32B
81.8
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 51.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 77. DeepSeekMath V2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.