Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
DeepSeekMath V2
63
Winner · 3/8 categoriesGemma 4 E4B
~47
1/8 categoriesDeepSeekMath V2· Gemma 4 E4B
Pick DeepSeekMath V2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
DeepSeekMath V2 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 63 to 47. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
DeepSeekMath V2's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 74 against 25.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BBH, 86% to 33.1%. Gemma 4 E4B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | DeepSeekMath V2 | Gemma 4 E4B |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65% | — |
| BrowseComp | 66% | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 61% | — |
| CodingGemma 4 E4B wins | ||
| HumanEval | 72% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | 45% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 44% | 52% |
| SWE-bench Pro | 51% | — |
| Multimodal & GroundedDeepSeekMath V2 wins | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 64% | 52.6% |
| OfficeQA Pro | 73% | — |
| ReasoningDeepSeekMath V2 wins | ||
| MuSR | 75% | — |
| BBH | 86% | 33.1% |
| LongBench v2 | 75% | — |
| MRCRv2 | 72% | 25.4% |
| KnowledgeDeepSeekMath V2 wins | ||
| GPQA | 79% | 58.6% |
| SuperGPQA | 77% | — |
| FrontierScience | 73% | — |
| SimpleQA | 77% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 69.4% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | 83% | — |
| Multilingual | ||
| MGSM | 87% | — |
| MMLU-ProX | 80% | — |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2024 | 82% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 81% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2023 | 76% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2024 | 78% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 77% | — |
| BRUMO 2025 | 79% | — |
| MATH-500 | 90% | — |
DeepSeekMath V2 is ahead overall, 63 to 47. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BBH, where the scores are 86% and 33.1%.
DeepSeekMath V2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.1 versus 65.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemma 4 E4B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 52 versus 46.9. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeekMath V2 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 74 versus 25.4. Inside this category, BBH is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeekMath V2 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.1 versus 52.6. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.