DeepSeekMath V2 vs o1-pro

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

DeepSeekMath V2 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 71 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o1-pro gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeekMath V2.

Quick Verdict

Pick DeepSeekMath V2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.

Knowledge

o1-pro

DeepSeekMath V2

67.2

o1-pro

79

80
MMLU
-
79
GPQA
79
77
SuperGPQA
-
75
OpenBookQA
-
74
MMLU-Pro
-
18
HLE
-

Coding

DeepSeekMath V2
72
HumanEval
-
45
SWE-bench Verified
-
44
LiveCodeBench
-

Mathematics

o1-pro

DeepSeekMath V2

80.4

o1-pro

86

80
AIME 2023
-
82
AIME 2024
86
81
AIME 2025
-
76
HMMT Feb 2023
-
78
HMMT Feb 2024
-
77
HMMT Feb 2025
-
79
BRUMO 2025
-
90
MATH-500
-

Reasoning

DeepSeekMath V2
77
SimpleQA
-
75
MuSR
-
86
BBH
-

Instruction Following

DeepSeekMath V2
83
IFEval
-

Multilingual

DeepSeekMath V2
87
MGSM
-

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeekMath V2 or o1-pro?

DeepSeekMath V2 is ahead overall, 71 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2024, where the scores are 82 and 86.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeekMath V2 or o1-pro?

o1-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79 versus 67.2. DeepSeekMath V2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for math, DeepSeekMath V2 or o1-pro?

o1-pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 86 versus 80.4. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 9, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.