Exaone 4.0 32B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B and Gemini 3.1 Pro finish on the same overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Quick Verdict

Treat this as a split decision. Exaone 4.0 32B makes more sense if knowledge is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile; Gemini 3.1 Pro is the better fit if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
77%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
86%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
68%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
91%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
75%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
71%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
72%
Coming soon
SWE-Rebench
62.3%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
95%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
95%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
93%
Coming soon
BBH
92%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
93%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
90%
Coming soon
ARC-AGI-2
77.1%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

Gemini 3.1 Pro

80.7

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
92%
Coming soon
MMLU
99%
Coming soon
GPQA
97%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
95%
Coming soon
HLE
40%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
88%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
95%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
95%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
96%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
93%

Mathematics

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

Gemini 3.1 Pro

97.1

85.3%
AIME 2025
98%
Coming soon
AIME 2023
99%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
99%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
95%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
97%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
96%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
96%
Coming soon
MATH-500
97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Exaone 4.0 32B and Gemini 3.1 Pro are tied on overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 80.7. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.1 versus 85.3. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.