Exaone 4.0 32B vs GLM-4.7

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 69. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 63.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85.3% to 95.7%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-4.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
41%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
52%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
61%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
94.2%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
73.8%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
84.9%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
51%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
66%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
76%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
80%
Coming soon
BBH
84%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
79%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
78%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

GLM-4.7

63.3

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
84.3%
Coming soon
MMLU
86%
Coming soon
GPQA
85.7%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
82%
Coming soon
HLE
24.8%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
72%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
46%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
88%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
94%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
78%

Mathematics

GLM-4.7

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

GLM-4.7

90.7

85.3%
AIME 2025
95.7%
Coming soon
AIME 2023
86%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
88%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
82%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
84%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
97.1%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or GLM-4.7?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 69. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 95.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or GLM-4.7?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 63.3. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 90.7 versus 85.3. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.