Exaone 4.0 32B vs GLM-5

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 62. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85.3% to 93.3%. GLM-5 does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GLM-5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
56.2%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
62%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
77.8%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
52%
Coming soon
SWE-Rebench
62.8%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Reasoning

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

GLM-5

62

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
82%
Coming soon
MMLU
91.7%
Coming soon
HLE
30.5%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
84%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Multilingual

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Mathematics

GLM-5

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

GLM-5

94.9

85.3%
AIME 2025
93.3%
Coming soon
MATH-500
97.4%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or GLM-5?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 93.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or GLM-5?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 62. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or GLM-5?

GLM-5 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 94.9 versus 85.3. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.