Exaone 4.0 32B vs GPT-OSS 20B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 35. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 21.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85.3% to 32%.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-OSS 20B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-OSS 20B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
35%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
42%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
31%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
23%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
14%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
11%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
18%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
31%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
42%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
27%
Coming soon
BBH
62%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
48%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

GPT-OSS 20B

21.9

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMLU
85.3%
Coming soon
GPQA
30%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
28%
Coming soon
HLE
1%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
34%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
29%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
61%

Mathematics

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

GPT-OSS 20B

31.1

85.3%
AIME 2025
32%
Coming soon
AIME 2023
31%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
33%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
27%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
29%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
28%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or GPT-OSS 20B?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 35. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 32%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or GPT-OSS 20B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 21.9. GPT-OSS 20B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or GPT-OSS 20B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 31.1. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.