Exaone 4.0 32B vs Qwen3.5 397B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 61. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 81.8% to 73%.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen3.5 397B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
58%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
62%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
52%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
75%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
42%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
39%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
42%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
56%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
78%
Coming soon
BBH
82%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
71%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

Qwen3.5 397B

61

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
73%
Coming soon
MMLU
83%
Coming soon
GPQA
82%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
80%
Coming soon
HLE
10%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
71%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
80%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
82%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
82%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
77%

Mathematics

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

Qwen3.5 397B

82.6

85.3%
AIME 2025
84%
Coming soon
AIME 2023
83%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
85%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
79%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
81%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
80%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
82%
Coming soon
MATH-500
81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Qwen3.5 397B?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 73%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Qwen3.5 397B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 61. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or Qwen3.5 397B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 82.6. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.