Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 22 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 9 to MiMo-V2.5.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- Gemini 2.5 Pro only
- 22
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 9
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 2.5 Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2.5 has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 58.62 versus 57.25. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
MiMo-V2.5 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Δ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 2.5 Pro63.8 | Margin← 7.7 | MiMo-V2.556.1 |
| Agentic | Gemini 2.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.565.8 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 2.5 Pro27.4 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5Not measured |
| Math | Gemini 2.5 Pro11.6 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5Not measured |
| Multimodal | Gemini 2.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.579.0 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 output | MiMo-V2.5Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/s | MiMo-V2.5Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 2.5 Pro21.19 s | MiMo-V2.5Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 2.5 Pro1M | MiMo-V2.51M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 7.1% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 54.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 42.01% | 46.89% | MiMo-V2.5 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 8.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 665 | — | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 62.3% | Not comparable |
| MM-ClawBenchSource | — | 23.8% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 65.8% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 16.9% | Not comparable |
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro wins6 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 83% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 18.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 25.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 84.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 21.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -14.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 39.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 87.4% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal5 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 48.7% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 58.62 to 57.25.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 63.8 versus 56.1. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.