Skip to main content

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

64

VS

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

66

0 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro unranked · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #23

Pick Qwen3.6-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 2.5 Pro only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
63.8vs66.9

+3.1 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
40.8vs60.5

+19.7 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.25 / $10

N/A

Speed

117 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

21.19s

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 2.5 Pro only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 66 versus 64. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 60.5 against 40.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 63.8% to 73.4%.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 2.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 63.8% and 73.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.5 versus 40.8. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 66.9 versus 63.8. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 28, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.