Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs o3-mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

50.24/100
Margin
3.6pts
← winning
OpenAI
46.59/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite #114 (Supported); o3-mini #141 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and o3-mini share 5 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite; 5 to o3-mini.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
5
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite only
15
o3-mini only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and o3-mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o3-mini is priced at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o3-mini.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and o3-mini
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteΔo3-mini
CodingGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measuredMarginNo overlapo3-mini49.3
KnowledgeGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measuredMarginNo overlapo3-mini77.2
MultimodalGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite73.2MarginNo overlapo3-miniNot measured
Inst. FollowingGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measuredMarginNo overlapo3-mini93.9

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.25 input / $1.5 outputo3-mini$1.1 input / $4.4 outputGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite205 tok/so3-mini160 tok/sGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite7.50 so3-mini7.12 so3-mini reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite1Mo3-mini200KGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 6.2%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 12.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 31.3%28.7%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
GDPval-AASource 7.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 649Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 38.46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 34.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 41.9%39.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 49.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniResult
AA-LCRSource 65.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 1.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.0%19.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 82.2%74.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-HLESource 16.2%8.7%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -15.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 36.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.6%Not comparable
MMLUSource 86.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 77.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniResult
AIME 2024Source 87.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniResult
CharXivSource 73.2%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-Liteo3-miniResult
AA-IFBenchSource 77.2%Not comparable
IFEvalSource 93.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and o3-mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and o3-mini today?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens o3-mini: $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026