Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

92

VS

Gemini 3.5 Flash

87

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.1 Pro unranked · Gemini 3.5 Flash #6

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Reasoning

Gemini 3.1 Pro
77.1vs74.7

+2.4 difference

Multimodal

Gemini 3.5 Flash
82.8vs83.8

+1.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2 / $12

$1.5 / $9

Speed

109 t/s

284.2 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

29.71s

18.55s

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 92 to 87. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.1 Pro's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 77.1 against 74.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ARC-AGI-2, 77.1% to 72.1%. Gemini 3.5 Flash does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 92 to 87. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 77.1% and 72.1%.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 74.7. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.8 versus 82.8. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 19, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.