Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
92
Gemini 3.5 Flash
87
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.1 Pro unranked · Gemini 3.5 Flash #6
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Reasoning
+2.4 difference
Multimodal
+1.0 difference
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$2 / $12
$1.5 / $9
109 t/s
284.2 t/s
29.71s
18.55s
1M
1M
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 92 to 87. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3.1 Pro's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 77.1 against 74.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ARC-AGI-2, 77.1% to 72.1%. Gemini 3.5 Flash does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 92 to 87. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 77.1% and 72.1%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 74.7. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.8 versus 82.8. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.