Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
92
Muse Spark
82
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Muse Spark only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Reasoning
+34.6 difference
Multimodal
+0.6 difference
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Muse Spark
$2 / $12
N/A
109 t/s
N/A
29.71s
N/A
1M
262K
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Muse Spark only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 92 to 82. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3.1 Pro's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 77.1 against 42.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ARC-AGI-2, 77.1% to 42.5%.
Muse Spark is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 92 to 82. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 77.1% and 42.5%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 42.5. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.8 versus 82.2. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.