Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Gemma 4 26B A4B
64
1/8 categoriesQwen3.5-122B-A10B
71
Winner · 3/8 categoriesGemma 4 26B A4B· Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 71 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.6 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 82.3% to 86.6%. Gemma 4 26B A4B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | — | 49.4% |
| BrowseComp | — | 63.8% |
| OSWorld-Verified | — | 58% |
| Tau2-Telecom | — | 79.5% |
| Claw-Eval | — | 47.1% |
| CodingGemma 4 26B A4B wins | ||
| LiveCodeBench | 77.1% | 78.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72% |
| Multimodal & GroundedQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 73.8% | 76.9% |
| ReasoningQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| BBH | 64.8% | — |
| MRCRv2 | 44.1% | — |
| LongBench v2 | — | 60.2% |
| KnowledgeQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| GPQA | 82.3% | 86.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 82.6% | 86.7% |
| HLE | 17.2% | — |
| HLE w/o tools | 8.7% | — |
| SuperGPQA | — | 67.1% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | — | 93.4% |
| Multilingual | ||
| MMLU-ProX | — | 82.2% |
| Mathematics | ||
| Coming soon | ||
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead overall, 71 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 82.3% and 86.6%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 56.1. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 76.3. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.2 versus 44.1. Gemma 4 26B A4B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.9 versus 73.8. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.