Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs Kimi K2.6

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

65

VS

Kimi K2.6

84

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 31B unranked · Kimi K2.6 #6

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Kimi K2.6
41.6vs72

+30.4 difference

Knowledge

Gemma 4 31B
61.3vs53.8

+7.5 difference

Multimodal

Kimi K2.6
76.9vs79.7

+2.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

Kimi K2.6

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0.95 / $4

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Kimi K2.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 84 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Kimi K2.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 41.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 26.5% to 34.7%. Gemma 4 31B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Kimi K2.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 31B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 26.5% and 34.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K2.6?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 53.8. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 41.6. Gemma 4 31B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.7 versus 76.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Kimi K2.6
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.