Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

74

VS

MiMo-V2-Flash

63

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

MiMo-V2-Flash
61.3vs84.5

+23.2 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

MiMo-V2-Flash

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

129 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

2.14s

Context Window

256K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Gemma 4 31B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 74 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemma 4 31B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 74 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 83.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 61.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 10, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.