Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Gemma 4 31B
73
Winner · 2/8 categoriesQwen3.5-122B-A10B
71
1/8 categoriesGemma 4 31B· Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.
Gemma 4 31B has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 73 versus 71. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Gemma 4 31B's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 66.4 against 60.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 84.3% to 86.6%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | — | 49.4% |
| BrowseComp | — | 63.8% |
| OSWorld-Verified | — | 58% |
| Tau2-Telecom | — | 79.5% |
| Claw-Eval | — | 47.1% |
| CodingGemma 4 31B wins | ||
| LiveCodeBench | 80% | 78.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72% |
| Multimodal & GroundedTie | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 76.9% | 76.9% |
| ReasoningGemma 4 31B wins | ||
| BBH | 74.4% | — |
| MRCRv2 | 66.4% | — |
| LongBench v2 | — | 60.2% |
| KnowledgeQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| GPQA | 84.3% | 86.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 85.2% | 86.7% |
| HLE | 26.5% | — |
| HLE w/o tools | 19.5% | — |
| SuperGPQA | — | 67.1% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | — | 93.4% |
| Multilingual | ||
| MMLU-ProX | — | 82.2% |
| Mathematics | ||
| Coming soon | ||
Gemma 4 31B is ahead overall, 73 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 86.6%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 61.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemma 4 31B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 80 versus 76.3. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemma 4 31B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 66.4 versus 60.2. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are effectively tied for multimodal and grounded tasks here, both landing at 76.9 on average.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.