Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

62

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

61

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 31B unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #26

Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
41.6vs72

+30.4 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
61.3vs81.6

+20.3 difference

Multimodal

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
76.9vs77.2

+0.3 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Gemma 4 31B finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 61. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Gemma 4 31B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 61. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 86.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 61.3. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 41.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 76.9. Inside this category, AA-MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 4, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.