Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GPT-5.2 Pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 90 to 35. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.2 Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 84.8 against 14.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 89 to 14.
GPT-5.2 Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-4.5-Air is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.2 Pro gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 128K for GLM-4.5-Air.
Pick GPT-5.2 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.5-Air only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
GPT-5.2 Pro
85.9
GLM-4.5-Air
30.3
GPT-5.2 Pro
84.8
GLM-4.5-Air
14.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
96
GLM-4.5-Air
39.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
95.2
GLM-4.5-Air
42.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
81.5
GLM-4.5-Air
31.1
GPT-5.2 Pro
95
GLM-4.5-Air
68
GPT-5.2 Pro
93.4
GLM-4.5-Air
59.1
GPT-5.2 Pro
98.2
GLM-4.5-Air
44.4
GPT-5.2 Pro is ahead overall, 90 to 35. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 89 and 14.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 31.1. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 84.8 versus 14.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 98.2 versus 44.4. Inside this category, HMMT Feb 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 95.2 versus 42.6. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.9 versus 30.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 96 versus 39.6. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 95 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 59.1. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.