GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GLM-4.7-Flash is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 62 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7-Flash's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 45.9 against 8.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 58 to 17.

GLM-4.7-Flash gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking.

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Agentic

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

61.3

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

34.1

64
Terminal-Bench 2.0
34
63
BrowseComp
37
57
OSWorld-Verified
32

Coding

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

45.9

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

8.2

58
HumanEval
17
40
SWE-bench Verified
10
45
LiveCodeBench
9
48
SWE-bench Pro
7

Multimodal & Grounded

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

62.5

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

32.4

58
MMMU-Pro
27
68
OfficeQA Pro
39

Reasoning

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

69.7

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

38.4

63
SimpleQA
29
61
MuSR
31
86
BBH
67
72
LongBench v2
39
76
MRCRv2
42

Knowledge

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

54.1

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

27

66
MMLU
27
65
GPQA
26
63
SuperGPQA
24
61
OpenBookQA
22
74
MMLU-Pro
51
15
HLE
2
63
FrontierScience
31

Instruction Following

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

84

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

72

84
IFEval
72

Multilingual

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

81.8

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

60.7

85
MGSM
62
80
MMLU-ProX
60

Mathematics

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

74

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

42.3

66
AIME 2023
28
68
AIME 2024
30
67
AIME 2025
29
62
HMMT Feb 2023
24
64
HMMT Feb 2024
26
63
HMMT Feb 2025
25
65
BRUMO 2025
27
85
MATH-500
61

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash is ahead overall, 62 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 58 and 17.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.1 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 45.9 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 74 versus 42.3. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 69.7 versus 38.4. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 34.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.5 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84 versus 72. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 60.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.