GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GLM-4.7-Flash has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 62 versus 60. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

GLM-4.7-Flash's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 45.9 against 35. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 58 to 71. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-4.7-Flash gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning).

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Agentic

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

61.3

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

58.5

64
Terminal-Bench 2.0
60
63
BrowseComp
61
57
OSWorld-Verified
55

Coding

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

45.9

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

35

58
HumanEval
62
40
SWE-bench Verified
39
45
LiveCodeBench
33
48
SWE-bench Pro
36

Multimodal & Grounded

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash

62.5

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

71.5

58
MMMU-Pro
71
68
OfficeQA Pro
72

Reasoning

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

69.7

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

69.2

63
SimpleQA
70
61
MuSR
70
86
BBH
80
72
LongBench v2
66
76
MRCRv2
66

Knowledge

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

54.1

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

52.1

66
MMLU
71
65
GPQA
70
63
SuperGPQA
68
61
OpenBookQA
66
74
MMLU-Pro
69
15
HLE
7
63
FrontierScience
62

Instruction Following

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

84

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

81

84
IFEval
81

Multilingual

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

81.8

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

77.8

85
MGSM
81
80
MMLU-ProX
76

Mathematics

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash

74

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

75.2

66
AIME 2023
73
68
AIME 2024
75
67
AIME 2025
74
62
HMMT Feb 2023
69
64
HMMT Feb 2024
71
63
HMMT Feb 2025
70
65
BRUMO 2025
72
85
MATH-500
79

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash is ahead overall, 62 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 58 and 71.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.1 versus 52.1. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 45.9 versus 35. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75.2 versus 74. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 69.7 versus 69.2. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 58.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.5 versus 62.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84 versus 81. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 77.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.