Seed-2.0-Lite vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed-2.0-Lite finishes one point ahead overall, 63 to 62. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Seed-2.0-Lite's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 79.6 against 62.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 80 to 58. GLM-4.7-Flash does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-4.7-Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while Seed-2.0-Lite is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed-2.0-Lite gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7-Flash.

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed-2.0-Lite if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7-Flash only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

GLM-4.7-Flash

Seed-2.0-Lite

55.1

GLM-4.7-Flash

61.3

52
Terminal-Bench 2.0
64
63
BrowseComp
63
53
OSWorld-Verified
57

Coding

GLM-4.7-Flash

Seed-2.0-Lite

41.4

GLM-4.7-Flash

45.9

63
HumanEval
58
45
SWE-bench Verified
40
37
LiveCodeBench
45
45
SWE-bench Pro
48

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

79.6

GLM-4.7-Flash

62.5

80
MMMU-Pro
58
79
OfficeQA Pro
68

Reasoning

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

73

GLM-4.7-Flash

69.7

68
SimpleQA
63
66
MuSR
61
85
BBH
86
76
LongBench v2
72
77
MRCRv2
76

Knowledge

GLM-4.7-Flash

Seed-2.0-Lite

53.9

GLM-4.7-Flash

54.1

71
MMLU
66
70
GPQA
65
68
SuperGPQA
63
66
OpenBookQA
61
73
MMLU-Pro
74
7
HLE
15
66
FrontierScience
63

Instruction Following

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

89

GLM-4.7-Flash

84

89
IFEval
84

Multilingual

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

82.5

GLM-4.7-Flash

81.8

87
MGSM
85
80
MMLU-ProX
80

Mathematics

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

75

GLM-4.7-Flash

74

71
AIME 2023
66
73
AIME 2024
68
72
AIME 2025
67
67
HMMT Feb 2023
62
69
HMMT Feb 2024
64
68
HMMT Feb 2025
63
70
BRUMO 2025
65
81
MATH-500
85

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Seed-2.0-Lite is ahead overall, 63 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 80 and 58.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.1 versus 53.9. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 45.9 versus 41.4. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75 versus 74. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 73 versus 69.7. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 55.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 62.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 84. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.5 versus 81.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.