GLM-4.7 vs Grok 4.3
Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
GLM-4.7 leads for most workloads by a narrow margin.
- Grok 4.3 offers ~5× the context window — choose it for very long inputs.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
GLM-4.7
63
Grok 4.3
63
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #34 · Grok 4.3 unranked
Treat this as a split decision. GLM-4.7 makes more sense if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill; Grok 4.3 is the better fit if you need the larger 1M context window.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 73.8 | ← 26.5 | 47.3 |
| Knowledge | 52.1 | ← 9.7 | 42.4 |
| Agentic | 45.7 | — | — |
| Math | 1.8 | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — | 78.1 |
| Inst. Following | — | — | 81.3 |
Operational Comparison
GLM-4.7
Grok 4.3
$0 / $0
$1.25 / $2.5
82 t/s
209 t/s
1.10s
12.36s
200K
1M
Quick Verdict
Treat this as a split decision. GLM-4.7 makes more sense if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill; Grok 4.3 is the better fit if you need the larger 1M context window.
GLM-4.7 and Grok 4.3 finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Grok 4.3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Grok 4.3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Grok 4.3?
GLM-4.7 and Grok 4.3 are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Grok 4.3?
GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.1 versus 42.4. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Grok 4.3?
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.8 versus 47.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.