Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GLM-4.7
68
Laguna M.1
51
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+0.5 difference
Coding
+12.0 difference
GLM-4.7
Laguna M.1
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
N/A
200K
131K
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 68 to 51. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 58.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 45.8%. Laguna M.1 does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GLM-4.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 131K for Laguna M.1.
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 68 to 51. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 45.8%.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 58.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Laguna M.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 45.8 versus 45.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.