Model comparison
GLM-4.7 vs Laguna M.1
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #32; Laguna M.1 unranked
Evidence parity. GLM-4.7 and Laguna M.1 share 2 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 29 results are unique to GLM-4.7; 3 to Laguna M.1.
Updated July 14, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- GLM-4.7 only
- 29
- Laguna M.1 only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 62 to 52. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.8 against 58.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 45.8%. Laguna M.1 does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Laguna M.1 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | GLM-4.773.8 | Margin← 15.1 | Laguna M.158.7 |
| Agentic | GLM-4.745.7 | Margin→ 0.1 | Laguna M.145.8 |
| Knowledge | GLM-4.752.1 | MarginNo overlap | Laguna M.1Not measured |
| Math | GLM-4.71.8 | MarginNo overlap | Laguna M.1Not measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 41%B 45.8%Winner: Laguna M.1Δ 4.8Terminal-Bench 2.0: GLM-4.7 scored 41%; Laguna M.1 scored 45.8%. Laguna M.1 wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 73.8%B 74.6%Winner: Laguna M.1Δ 0.8SWE-bench Verified: GLM-4.7 scored 73.8%; Laguna M.1 scored 74.6%. Laguna M.1 wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GLM-4.7 | Laguna M.1 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GLM-4.7$0 input / $0 output | Laguna M.1Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GLM-4.782 tok/s | Laguna M.1Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GLM-4.71.10 s | Laguna M.1Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GLM-4.7200K | Laguna M.1256K | Laguna M.1 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticLaguna M.1 wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Laguna M.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 41% | 45.8% | Laguna M.1 leads |
| BrowseCompSource | 52% | — | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | 15.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 25.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Tau2-TelecomSource | 95.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 39.95% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1165 | — | Not comparable |
CodingGLM-4.7 wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Laguna M.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 73.8% | 74.6% | Laguna M.1 leads |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | 84.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-RebenchSource | 58.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 45.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 31.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 45.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA LiveCodeBenchSource | 89.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 63.1% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 49.2% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 45.8% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Laguna M.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 85.7% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 84.3% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 24.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 33.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 85.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 25.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -34.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 29.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 90.3% | — | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Laguna M.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1260 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Laguna M.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 67.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Laguna M.1?
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 52. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 45.8%.
Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Laguna M.1?
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.8 versus 58.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Laguna M.1?
Laguna M.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 45.8 versus 45.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.