Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

MiMo-V2.5 leads for most workloads.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

GLM-4.7

63

VS

MiMo-V2.5

65

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #34 · MiMo-V2.5 unranked

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkGLM-4.7ΔMiMo-V2.5
Agentic45.7 20.165.8
Coding73.8 17.756.1
Knowledge52.1
Math1.8
Multimodal79.0

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

MiMo-V2.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$null / $null

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

MiMo-V2.5 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 65 versus 63. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

MiMo-V2.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.8 against 45.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 65.8%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 65.8%.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.5?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.8 versus 56.1. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 45.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.